Cycles of Contact and the Field of Dreams

Cycles are as much part of the pattern of consciousness and contact as anything. Waxing and waning attention goes with the territory, just like life. Are we ever really focused on just ONE THING so entirely that we lose ourselves in it? Everything comes around in cycles, sometimes a bit more active, yet cycles nevertheless. Our knowledge builds in layers of experiential understanding, sometimes validated by the explorations and sharings of others who have gone down similar paths of discovery.

Grant‘s bit of research confirms cyclical and escalating patterns of contact, with no obvious recognition or disclosure. Richard‘s work has shifted a bit from historical to probative, but still cursory in the nature of the evolution of intelligence. Whitley‘s work as continued to progress as part of the process of his own curiosity and layers of new experiential information/understanding. Jeffrey‘s continual inquiry, since early interviews with Jacques Vallee, opens both experiential and psychological aspects of the phenomena and yet leaves a deeper question unasked, imho. Joseph‘s tenure shares a bit more interactive opportunities and relative communication that seems more beneficial to humans. All of the participation of those mentioned and more is important in the roll out of the star family enigma’s unfoldment.

I wonder if the disappointment and potential disturbance of the proverbial ‘seeker’ comes from exhausted inquiry in unproductive lines. Many speak of intelligence, spiritual aspects, multidimensional perspectives that prevail in ongoing activity. Few who have those experiences talk about them, and even fewer who do talk are offered attention beyond statistical representation. Events aren’t necessarily repeatable yet certain aspects of them, usually the very subtle and often obscure, constantly repeat themselves… like the question of submission to something beyond our comprehension and thus the fear of letting go.

If an advanced intelligence witnesses a pattern of ambivalence or outright dismissal, would they continue doing the same thing to get attention or to share critical information regarding how their historical events may be helpful to the evolution of our planetary society? What are the differences between perceived trivial details humans think important and the really important details we seem to constantly overlook that appear to be couched in nearly every communication or experience?

The couched: There is harmony in the universe, trust it is within us to discover and manifest. So often we profess a certain faith and trust in the universe and then when the opportunity arises to implement it, we do not. All the supposed confrontations created in ‘contact’ scenarios lead to fearlessness and on to trusting the universe… ‘perfect love’ as it is written. Perhaps the next question might be something like, “How do we ascend from polarity paradigms that keep us constricted in our thinking?”

I’m solid in my experience, still curious and inquiring as to how to BE in the overall scheme of things and my trust in the universe is impeccable. Now without a life altering experience, or several in some cases, it is hard to relate, if at all, to an understanding that evolves and unfolds as it does in such cases. I can cite several who’ve had those transformations or are still in process. Constant curiosity coupled with the fearless pursuit of experience and understanding lead us to worlds beyond our comprehension, yet not beyond our ability to explore IF we are ‘right’ within. That place is individually introspective and collectively unifying.

The obvious next phase of human activity isn’t with the star families nor are they the most important aspect of humanity’s next phase of evolution. It is the recognition of being on one planet, together, as one humanity. It is reported that the Galactic Federation is made up of many races and planetary systems. There really isn’t any other faction working against it. So, how or what might we learn from that unification for the advancement of planetary civilizations? We’ve got to stop looking at things in human, bi-polar, perspectives. That is our creation and we need to own it.

All the contrivances regarding command and control features of our current world economy and planetary administration are moot points, including ‘disclosure’ as well. Yet, how many posts reflect daily shouts about such things? We fail to be disciplined in our manner and speech. Our attention is too easily distracted by shiny objects and less focused on that inner truth looking place we’re all told is there, functional and universal. Someday those who live among us might surface. That would certainly ramp up the excitement. Or would it?

Ruth Montgomery’s book ‘Strangers Among Us: Enlightened Beings from a World to Come’ published in 1978 contains most all the information still being regurgitated today. It also provided a significant ‘synchronicity’ in dropping off a bookshelf in a metaphysical bookstore in Muncie, IN, right in front of me in March of 1981. It was opened, face up, to a page that spoke of the regularity of the orange cigar-shaped cloud being common in contact cases in the Midwest in the late 50s and early 60s.

I was part of that early 60s flap with bi-monthly visits to an orange cigar-shaped cloud that, as an 8 year old, presented a sense of intrigue, fearlessness and a sense of familiarity I still hold today. The learning that took place has been a constant source of insight as I’ve grown in the intelligence/knowledge to understand the aspects of form, fit and function as conscious beings on Earth. The whole of ufology is remiss in exploring this reality, of consciousness with design and purpose, imho.

Advanced intelligence would include an intimate understanding of how universal law and order permeates reality, its planes of consciousness and attending universal opportunities for learning how to get along or experience a trust in All That Is that reveals both experience and understanding to those who are ready or at least available through suspension of any and all belief systems. We simply cannot understand things as they are when we have filters in place that do not allow that process.

Authors like Montgomery and others have also been caught up in predictive distractions and have to cover there tracks later when the predictions don’t happen. That seems to be a pattern in human behavior as well, especially after some sort of mystical event. Still, the idea she presented in the 70s, of non-human intelligent beings living amongst humanity in order to assist their evolution, seems plausible, possible and perhaps a reality that still doesn’t get much conversation 40 years later.

Advanced intelligence would include an intimate understanding of how universal law and order permeates reality, its planes of consciousness and attending universal opportunities for learning how to get along or experience a trust in All That Is. It often reveals both experience and understanding to those who are ready or at least available through suspension of any and all belief systems. We simply cannot understand things as they are when we have filters in place that do not allow that process.

I’ve wondered if folks were more susceptible to fear-based events, like disasters and such, especially when it comes to the dreams and visions. We’re preoccupied with them, I think. How often do we ‘get’ that cool stuff is about to happen? Or, is more of that happening and the bad news just gets more press? Perhaps it is a sensitivity to the ‘energy’ and the entropy of disasters or storms, yet the predictability is still not reliable.

Events and experiences seem to be tailored to the individual as much as anything, using what is internal and presenting information in relative terms that could be (not necessarily is) interpreted with clarity. Archetypal signatures as well as potential correlations are what brings us to a new living awareness, often presented through contact events to those who are internally driven to hang on to their seat and ride it out… fearlessly.

Alas, I’m just as susceptible to the ebb and flow of interest. I distance myself from the regurgitation of information, yet new arrivals to the journey are served by the process. My intention is constant, regardless of the activity… to be authentic and available on any level necessary. The tap on the shoulder, the moment of contact, the ecstasy of the union of consciousness in process is beyond words yet ever-present in the quest for understanding form, fit and function.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *